Search

  • Google

    WWW
    esbalogh.typepad.com

News around the World

  • Pusztaranger: Neues aus Ungarn
    An excellent German-language blog on Hungary
  • Galamus-Csoport
    A Hungarian-language internet paper. News and opinions by leading Hungarian commentators. galamus.hu
  • JeToTak
    A Slovak website that provides readers with analyses and commentaries on domestic and world events. The language is Slovak, but the editors are experimenting with the introduction of some English language items, including selected articles from Hungarian Spectrum.

« U.S.-Hungarian relations | Main | "Defenders of the hospital" and Hospinvest »

July 30, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e009865ae5883300e553e0a6108834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Another bomb scare in Budapest:

Comments

Odin's lost eye

I always find it interesting how the ‘know-it-all’ journalists always stuff their oars in and muddy the water. The truth is ‘those who can – do’. Those who ‘cannot do' become journalists and write about it.
A half ton medium case bomb is has about 250 to 300 Kgs of ‘bang-stuff’ in it and at this age this would be very sensitive. Explosives of any kind are dangerous ½ grams of the stuff can badly injure a persons hand.
The primers may have deliquesced and can turn the copper in their brass containers into something akin to copper acetalide (thinking about it will set it off), the initiator may have tured into some form of tri-nitro glycerine (look at it cross eyed and up it goes!). The main filling will have decayed into something rather nasty. A lot of effort went into making bombs very difficult and dangerous to defuse. Both sides lost a lot of Bomb-busters who tried to do that.
These things are ‘B’ dangerous they can go off by themselves. Traffic vibrations, hot water, all sorts of things can cause it.
The use of ‘wheel-barrows’ (remotely controlled vehicles) allows the ammunition technicians to work in greater safety, but someone (the senior officer) still has to go up to the thing and have a good look round. Ultra-sonic probes and X-rays do give you some sort of idea as to what is inside, but using them can be dangerous especially if there are condenser timers inside. With all this equipment, if the *?$%! think goes off there will be much damage. Do not blame them it is what they were ment to do!
The usual trick (if you can get at them) is to remove the primers so quickly that they do not have time to set off the initiator.
In terms of damage I can only quote what I remember and the pressures are in P.S.I. (pounds per square inch)
1 Psi light damage glass shatters light injuries from debris
3 Psi Houses collapse, severe Injuries and fatalities. Debris is travelling at over 100 KmH
5 Psi Most structures will collapse; severe Injuries are universal with many fatalities. Debris is travelling at over 260 KmH.
40 Psi your lungs would burst…..
I will not go on but at 260 KmH a length of 50mmX50mm wood would go straight a sheet of galvanised steel and straight through you!
Why not tell the people the facts then they will understand. The only problem is that Hungarians do not listen!
Years ago I sometimes had to tell fishermen about dangers of old sea mines. Once we had an old one we blew it up about 10Nm away from the shore where the course was being held. That kept the fishermen out of mischief for years!
Professor why not ask one of your journalist friends to write an article about what happens when a 1/2 tonner goes 'POOF'?

Eva S. Balogh

Odin: "why not ask one of your journalist friends to write an article about what happens when a 1/2 tonner goes 'POOF'?"

Odin, you gave me an idea. I will send your letter to someone who might be interested in it.

Stan

Massacre of civilians by carpet bombing is not a war crime. I wonder why? Destroying Dresden or Hiroshima, who cares. Shoot one Jew because you were ordered to do so is enough to get chased around the world for 60 years. Go figure...

Viking

Well Stan,

could it be that History is written by those who win a war and not by the losers?

Hardly the winners would call their own actions for crimes, they have a long list to justify them.

Most International Treaties on these issues were created *after* the end of WWII, so there existed no International Law or Body that could decide on these matters independently. That is the simple fact.

That is why we see Karadizs in court today.

Vladimir

In the states, we stereotyped Germans as being oft-complainers. But after living here, it's clear to me that such a stereotype shouldn't have been limited to Germans. (although a great many here seem to have at least some Teutonic heritage)

dave

I think mentioning the HirTV and Echo TV is beside the point. Prime Minister Ferenc Gyurcsany thanked the patience of the people affected by this dangerous operation. Also, he emphasized the preparedness and the expertise of the services involved. For those who read Hungarian, here is the link:
http://mszp.hu/belfold/bovebben/gyurcsany-ferenc-miniszterelnok-kozlemenye

That is the real news, not the obviously biased reporting of these media outlets with minimal audience.

Stan

Dave,
What makes you think Echo TV and HirTV have smaller audiences
or less credibility than the MSZP website?

dave

Stan,
Prime Minister Ferenc Gyurcsany has larger audience than those extremist private cable TV channels. This is how it should be.

Odin's lost eye

Stan "Massacre of civilians by carpet bombing is not a war crime. I wonder why? Destroying Dresden or Hiroshima, who cares"
On the topic of Hiroshima there was a great deal of soul searching in the U.S. before the decision was taken to use the weapon. On the basis of the nature of the fighting as the Americans closed in on the Japanese homeland. The American General staff concluded that the assault on the Japanese home islands would cost the allies about 2 Million casualties. It also reviewed battles like that for Iwo Jima where of the 21,000 Japanese soldiers at the start of the battle only 216 were taken prisoner. Also large numbers of civilians committed suicide rather than fall into American hands. The conclusion was that Japanese casualties would range from 10 to 20 millions! The weapon was used on Hiroshima and Nagasaki (Nagasaki was an alternative target) with a result that some 300,000 people died. War is nasty! I leave you to draw your own conclusions.
Dresden was another matter. The Russians had asked the Western Allies to use their Strategic Air force to bomb the enemy rear. In the center are to be found not just the main railway junctions, but also the communication systems, the administrative headquarters, the utilities ... Destroy and disrupt these and you have chaos not just in the city but also in the entire surrounding area. To quote from official memorands “This was one of he key lessons that British planners had learned long ago from the German bombing of Coventry. The damage inflicted on the city's infrastructure had lasted far longer and caused more long-term difficulties for war production than the actual bombing of the industrial plants” There was a secondary consideration which was that as the Red army was only some 90 or so Kms away the raid if successful would put the ‘Fear of the Lord’ up the Russian top brass. The West had fears that the Red Army might not stop when it met up with the allies.
Draw your own conclusions!

Stan

Odin, The logical answer to why Hiroshima was nuked is not the popular "let's save lives", at least not only that.
The US had a new weapon of mass destruction, never really tested. The war was almost over, this was the last chance to see what this baby can do. Everyone hated the Japs, no worries of retaliation, and it can be justified by the "saving lives" argument. If the US just wanted to show off, they could have dropped it anywhere. They needed a test ground, and it was Hiroshima. And Nagasaki.

Dresden had no major significance as military target. Destroying it in such barbaric fashion served only as psychological warfare, break the German spirit, no matter what we all lose in the process.

Neither the Russians nor the US had much respect for European culture. Americans almost blew up the Leaning Tower in Pisa, saying that there might be snipers there.

We should never again allow barbarians to Europe...

Odin's lost eye

Re the 2 ton bomb. It was probably a 4000Lbs 'Cookie' or 'Block Buster'. These were light case bombs with triple barostatic fuses and were intended to blow the roofs off buildings and allow the entry of the rain of smaller incendiary bombs. I do not thing the B17 could carry them, the B24 ‘Liberator’ might have been able to. The Lancaster certainly could and did. This means that this one may well have been dropped during a night raid so you can (once again) blame the British.
Night attacks were special having highly skilled ‘pathfinders’ who not only marked the target but also the ‘turning points as well. The bombers flew not in formations but in ‘streams’. Navigation was always difficult. Astro navigation could be especially so. The bubble sextant was not easy to use and could give erroneous results. These could lead to errors of over 50 Nm. Electronic devices like Gee, Rebecca H and Oboe could be (and were) jammed by the enemy. The use of H2S (a ground search radar) allowed night fighters to home in onto you. In or above cloud the drift sight and Bombsight were useless. Finally map reading over a blacked out landscape

Stan

"It was probably a 4000Lbs".

No, it wasn't even a bomb.
It was just an old, harmless, rusty boiler.
No poof.

btphelps

A cursory search on the topic reveals that it is naive to say the U.S. just wanted to roll out a nuke and see what it could do.

In fact, the U.S. had made war plans for the invasion of the Japanese mainland. "The invasion fleet was to include 42 aircraft carriers, 24 battleships, and over 400 destroyers and destroyer escorts. The fleet would escort 14 American divisions, both Army and Marine Corps, that would form the initial assault force." (http://ww2db.com/battle_spec.php?battle_id=54)

Given the Japanese people's fanatical defense of home turf like that experienced at Iwo Jima, the brass had enormous reservations about both the human and economic cost of a U.S. invasion of the Japanese homeland. One study done by the United States Joint Chiefs of Staff in Apr 1945 put the coat at a minimum of 456,000 casualties.

So when the Bomb became available, Truman saw that dropping the nuke was the only reasonable alternative. The U.S. government never really discussed not using the Bomb. The alternative was just too awful to contemplate. The Japanese started the war; I don't think Truman hesitated very long about letting them pay the final price.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Blog powered by TypePad

  • Google Analytics rev